[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:36:01 -0800
From: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 16:52 -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Nicholas Miell wrote:
>
> > The point Ingo was making is that the x86 ABI already requires the FPU
> > context to be saved before *all* function calls.
>
> I've not seen that among Ingo's points, but yeah some status is caller
> saved. But, aren't things like status word and control bits callee saved?
> If that's the case, it might require proper handling.
>
Ingo mentioned it in one of the parts you cut out of your reply:
> and here is where thinking about threadlets as a function call and not
> as an asynchronous context helps alot: the classic gcc convention for
> FPU use & function calls should apply: gcc does not call an external
> function with an in-use FPU stack/register, it always neatly unuses it,
> as no FPU register is callee-saved, all are caller-saved.
The i386 psABI is ancient (i.e. it predates SSE, so no mention of the
XMM or MXCSR registers) and a bit vague (no mention at all of the FP
status word), but I'm fairly certain that Ingo is right.
--
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists