| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:23:50 +0100 From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ian.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] highres: Do not run the TIMER_SOFTIRQ after switching to highres mode On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 08:12 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >>> The question is, how the tick timer gets enqueued in the softirq queue. > >>> Can you isolate the codepath, where this happens ? > > > > The TIMER_SOFTIRQ runs the hrtimers during bootup until a usable > > clocksource and clock event sources are registered. The switch to high > > resolution mode happens inside of the TIMER_SOFTIRQ, but runs the > > softirq afterwards. That way the tick emulation timer, which was set up > > in the switch to highres might be executed in the softirq context, which > > is a BUG. The rbtree has not to be touched by the softirq after the > > highres switch. > > > > And an additional request, just to make it explicit that we should not > have any NO_SOFTIRQ callbacks in the tree; BUG out if we encounter such > a thing. > > Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ian.org> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists