linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/18] 2.6.18-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:13:20 +0200
From:	"S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 00/18] 2.6.18-stable review

05 Mar 2007 Pts tarihinde, Greg KH şunları yazmıştı: 
> > So maybe 2.6.18 deserves another stable release :) ?
>
> Why?  Does anyone really use it now that 2.6.19 and 2.6.20 is out?
>
> I don't want to do a new release as we need to catch up on the 2.6.20
> issues...
>
> And also remember, the point of the -stable tree was that we would drop
> older releases after the next release came out.

I know, i just referred your "Barring anything extremely serious, this will be 
the last 2.6.18 based release." sentence from last stable release 
announcement and some security regressions seems something to me and just 
want to ping :) and of course i clearly understand your point of -stable tree 
maintanence with much more up2date kernel and drop olders view.

Cheers
-- 
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/

Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped