linux-kernel - Re: Raid 10 Problems?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2007 04:32:07 +0100 (MET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Marc Perkel <mperkel@...oo.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 10 Problems?


On Mar 4 2007 19:17, Marc Perkel wrote:
>Thanks - because of your suggestion I had found the
>instructions. But you have some interesting options
>set. 
>
>-N nicearray -b internal -e 1.0
>
>Are these important?

  -N? What's in a name? I suppose, it's not so important.
  (Arrays are identified by their UUID anyway. But maybe
  udev can do something with the name someday as it does
  today with /dev/disk/*.)

  -b internal -- seems like a good idea to speed up
  resynchronization.

  -e 1.0 -- I wonder why the new superblock format is
  not default in mdadm (0.90 is still used).


>pci=nommconf iommu=soft

The nvidia chipset corruption problem?



Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/