| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 12:17:06 +0100 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: any thoughts yet on a "generic" ioctl.h? Robert P. J. Day wrote: > each simplification could be submitted as > a separate arch-specific patch, as many things are. > > i was more asking about the *philosophy* of that patch, The justification of this initial patch is more obvious if followed up by those subsequent patches which make use of the initial one. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== --== --=== http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists