linux-kernel - Re: Question: schedule()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:39:59 -0500
From:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To:	albcamus <albcamus@...il.com>
CC:	Mockern@...dex.ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question: schedule()

albcamus wrote:
> your kthread IS preemptible unless you call preempt_disable or some
> locking functions explicitly .
> 
I think he's trying to go the other way, make his thread the highest 
priority to blow anything else in the system out of the water. See his 
previous post "how to make kernel thread more faster?"

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/