linux-kernel - Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:37:09 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org,
	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning

> Quoting Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>:
> Subject: Re: SATA resume slowness, e1000 MSI warning
> 
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il> writes:
> 
> >> Rumor has it that some pci devices can't tolerate < 32bit accesses.
> >> Although I have never met one.
> >
> > hopefully not bridge devices?
> >
> >> The two factors together suggest that
> >> for generic code it probably makes sense to operate on 32bit
> >> quantities, and just to ignore the read-only portion.
> >
> > The code for regular devices seems to use 16-bit accesses, so
> > I think it's best to stay consistent. Or do you want to change this too?
> 
> If we are stomping rare probabilities we might as well change that too.
> The code to save pci-x state is relatively recent.  So it probably just
> hasn't met a problem device yet (assuming they exist).

OK I guess. I gather we assume writing read-only registers has no side effects?
Are there rumors circulating wrt to these?

-- 
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/