linux-kernel - Re: [patch 6/9] signalfd/timerfd v1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:42:08 -0800 (PST)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 6/9] signalfd/timerfd v1 - timerfd core ...

On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> (That said, using "struct itimerspec" might be a good idea. That would 
> also obviate the need for TFD_TIMER_SEQ, since an itimerspec automatically 
> has both "base" and "incremental" parts).

But TFD_TIMER_SEQ is a simple auto-rearm case of TFD_TIMER_REL. So the 
timespec is sufficent too (in all three cases we just need *one* time). 
Actually, the only place where I can find the itimerspec usefull, is 
indeed with TFD_TIMER_SEQ. In cases where you want you clock starting at a 
given time (it_value) *and* with the given frequency (it_interval).

- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/