linux-kernel - Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2007 01:48:35 -0400
From:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@...il.com>,
	Douglas McNaught <doug@...aught.org>,
	Patrick Mau <mau@...ar.ping.de>
Subject: Re: Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29)

On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:04:42AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 12 March 2007, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
>> >On 3/12/07, Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com> wrote:
>> >> On Monday 12 March 2007, Douglas McNaught wrote:
>> >> >Patrick Mau <mau@...ar.ping.de> writes:
>> >> >> Why not temporarly replace "/bin/tar" with a shell script that
>> >> >> does:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> #!/bin/sh
>> >> >> exec strace -f -o output /bin/real.tar $@
>> >> >
>> >> >You beat me to it.  :) I've done that before; it's a great
>> >> > suggestion.
>> >> >
>> >> >Except that if you expect 'tar' to be invoked multiple times in a
>> >> > run, you should probably use 'output.$$' for the output filename
>> >> > so things don't get clobbered.
>> >> >
>> >> >-Doug
>> >>
>> >> In my case, Doug, it will get invoked 64 times, amanda does a dummy
>> >> run to get an estimate, calculates what to do based on that output
>> >> which is 32 runs, 1 per disklist entry and I have 32, and then
>> >> reruns tar with the appropriate level options against each
>> >> individual disklist entry.
>> >>
>> >> But I'm puzzled a bit, what does the double $$ do?, or it buried
>> >> someplace in the bash manpage?  Its not something I've stumbled
>> >> over yet.
>> >
>> >buried indeed:
>> >
>> >"Special Parameters:
>> >  ...
>> >       $      Expands to the process ID of the shell.  In a  ()
>> > subshell,  it expands  to  the  process  ID of the current shell,
>> > not the sub?$B!> shell.
>> >"
>>
>> Well, that's clear enough, but what of the double $$ case?  Would this
>> them make a PID unique to each invocation untill it finally wraps a 16
>> bit value, or will the kernel re-use them because they won't all be
>> running simultainiously, but limited by the number of unique 'spindle'
>> numbers on the system, this to prevent as best as it can, the
>> thrashing of a drive by having tar working on 2 separate (or more)
>> partitions at the same time.  In my case 2 are possible, as /var is on
>> a separate drive.
>
>Yes there a risk of wrapping, but it is very small. You can add the
> command line arguments to the file name if you want, like this :
>
>#!/bin/sh
>exec strace -f -o "output.$$.${*//\//_}" /bin/real.tar $@
>
>It will name the output file "output.<pid>.<args>", replacing slashes
> with underscores. This is very dirty but can help.
>
Excellent Willy, thanks.

>Cheers,
>Willy



-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Whatever doesn't succeed in two months and a half in California will
never succeed.
		-- Rev. Henry Durant, founder of the University of California
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/