lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:07:14 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Leroy van Logchem <leroy.vanlogchem@...elft.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	roland@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu, stable@...nel.org, greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix COMPAT_VDSO regression bug

> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:38:40 +0100 Leroy van Logchem <leroy.vanlogchem@...elft.nl> wrote:
>     Revert "[PATCH] Fix CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO"
>     This reverts commit a1f3bb9ae4497a2ed3eac773fd7798ac33a0371f.
> 
>     Several systems couldnt boot using CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y as
>     reported in bug #8040. Reverting the above patch solved the problem.

I think reverting it is probably the right thing to do, unless we can fix it for
real quite promptly.

But nobody will be able to apply this patch - your email client as really gone
to town on it - the results are phenomenally ugly.

And the patch wouldn't have applied to mainline anyway - there have been other changes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ