linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i386: Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:08:05 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	eranian@....hp.com, rdunlap@...otime.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common
 implementation

> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:12:55 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Subject: Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation
> 
> smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete
> duplicates of the same logic.  This patch combines them by
> implementing them in terms of the more general
> smp_call_function_mask().

Hopeless, sorry.   It's probably time to start thinking about raising x86
patches against the x86 tree (at least).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/