| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:20:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> To: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML utrace support, step 1 > Did I send the right patch? The one I meant to send (appended below), > indeed builds and runs without utrace-regset.patch and > utrace-core.patch applied. It's utrace-1 in the following: That is not the same patch I tried before. This one does apply and build fine (after make defconfig ARCH=um). Technically utrace_native_view doesn't belong in the tracehook patch (but in the regset one to follow it), but it is harmless. I've merged it into my current tree. You can get this via GIT if you like that. I do regular merges from Linus's GIT tree, so any upstream UML changes that merge cleanly or have trivial conflict fixes I can do will be taken care of automatically. For future updates, please send me incremental changes based on my current stuff; the GIT branches and the 2.6-current patches on my utrace web page always match up. My patch set generation uses just one fixed log message for utrace-tracehook-um.patch, so tell me if you want to adjust it from log text in today's patch. Thanks, Roland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists