| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:37:26 -0500 From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@...il.com> To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: forced umount? On 3/16/07, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote: > Mike Snitzer wrote: > > Is this forced umount work even considered worthwhile by the greater > > Linux community? Is anyone actively working on this? > > Have a look at all the discussion about revoke/frevoke on lkml over the > last week or two. Thanks for the heads up; its good to see that Pekka Enberg's work has continued. I actually stumbled onto that line of work earlier while searching for more info on Tigran Aivazian's forced unmount (badfs) patches: http://lwn.net/Articles/192632/ Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists