linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/7] containers (V7): Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:50:32 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To:	menage@...gle.com
Cc:	sekharan@...ibm.com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...ru, dev@...ru,
	rohitseth@...gle.com, pj@....com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	mbligh@...gle.com, winget@...gle.com, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	serue@...ibm.com, devel@...nvz.org, Maneesh <maneesh@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/7] containers (V7): Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:26:51PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:15:22AM -0800, menage@...gle.com wrote:
> > +static void remove_dir(struct dentry *d)
> > +{
> > +	struct dentry *parent = dget(d->d_parent);
> 
> Don't we need to lock parent inode's mutex here? sysfs seems to take
> that lock.

Never mind. Maneesh pointed me to do_rmdir() in VFS which takes that
mutex as well.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/