linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] sched: staircase deadline misc fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:55:49 -0400
From:	"michael chang" <thenewme91@...il.com>
To:	"Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de>
Cc:	"Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org>, "ck list" <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	"linux list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] sched: staircase deadline misc fixes

On 3/29/07, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> Rereading to make sure I wasn't unclear anywhere...
>
> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 07:50 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > I don't see what a < 95% load really means.
>
> Egad.  Here I'm pondering the numbers and light load as I'm typing, and
> my fingers (seemingly independent when mind wanders off) typed < 95% as
> in not fully committed, instead of "light".

While I don't know the _exact_ figure for this, my hunch is that a
good ballpark figure is anything that is not a heavy load (less than
4, perhaps even lower, maybe <0.75 or <2?) and that is not a "niced"
load.

-- 
-- Michael Chang
~Just the crazy copy cat~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/