lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:43:16 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com> To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Dependent CPU core speed reporting not updated with CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_HW? Hi Venki, I have a dual-Woodcrest machine here with _PSD tables that specify that cpufreq coordination between cores is done in hardware with DOMAIN_COORD_TYPE_HW_ALL. On this particular machine, CPU 0 and CPU 2 are on the same package, and it looks like they have to be at the same frequency. However, it seems that acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init() only sets policy->cpus to the shared cpu mask if software coordination is required. While this does have the effect of letting the hardware do its coordination job as advertised, it also means that a frequency change to CPU0 doesn't get echoed to CPU2 as it should be, and affected_cpus is inaccurate. This seems like a bug to me. I can whip up a patch to set the policy cpu mask in all cases and neuter all but one of the MSR/PCT writes if HW coordination is desired so that HW coordination is preserved and sysfs is accurate, but I'm curious to know if I've gotten it right. --D - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists