| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 21:40:58 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com> To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, menage@...gle.com, akpm@...l.org, pj@....com, sekharan@...ibm.com, dev@...ru, xemul@...ru, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org, mbligh@...gle.com, winget@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com, devel@...nvz.org Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:32:20AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > But frankly I don't know where we stand right now wrt the containers > patches. Do most people want to go with Vatsa's latest version moving > containers into nsproxy? > Has any other development been going on? I have another update to the rcfs patches more or less ready to go. I hope to post them out this week. Note that from user or controller perspective, there should be very little difference between the two patches. rcfs is, I would say, same as container patches to the extent of 70-80%. The rest of the difference is mainly avoiding a new pointer in task_struct and new structures to represent a task_group. -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists