lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:43:39 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/17] Add pagetable accessors to pack and unpack pagetable
 entries

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> the main metric we are interested in is the overhead for people who just 
> want to run the non-patched native kernel that has CONFIG_PARAVIRT 
> enabled (99%+ of the users at the moment), so the delta is:
>
>  null:              +12.0%
>  null IO:            +7.5%
>  stat:        within noise
>  open/close:  within noise
>  TCP:                ~5.0%
>  signal install:      2.0%
>  signal handle:       4.7%
>  fork:                2.7%
>  exec:                3.6%
>  shell:               3.6%
>   
Hm, I don't think you can get this much precision out of these numbers. 
I noticed larger variations from boot-to-boot running the same test.

> this is not 'barely measurable' but 'BLOODY LARGE' overhead.

Yes.  Fortunately there's a noticable difference between native and
unpatched paravirt, because it shows all the effort we put into patching
is worthwhile.

>> paravirt, patching
>> ezr       Linux 2.6.21- 1000 0.25 0.53 31.8 34.4 10.1 1.04 5.44 730. 1583 4600
>> ezr       Linux 2.6.21- 1000 0.26 0.55 32.1 35.2 13.3 1.03 5.48 748. 1589 4606
>> ezr       Linux 2.6.21- 1000 0.26 0.54 32.0 34.9 14.1 1.04 5.43 752. 1606 4647
>>     
>
> i guess this pretty much makes the case for patching ...
>   

Right, that's why there's patching.


    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ