lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed,  4 Apr 2007 14:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	"Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <blaisorblade@...oo.it>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] utrace - uml: make UML compile with utrace enabled

Technically those two symbols should not be touched in
utrace-tracehook-um.patch at all, and patches are still entirely missing
for the CONFIG_PTRACE=y build to work.  I refrained from excising them from
the patch just to be anal since I didn't have Jeff's sign-off on that.
What I'd prefer is to remove utrace_native_view from the current patch and
leave it out until there is a utrace-reget-um.patch to define it for real.

I will change utrace-tracehook.patch so it does not call arch_ptrace.
Then there will be no need to leave a definition behind when it's an empty
stub like in utrace-tracehook-um.patch.  (The only reason I left
arch_ptrace code around after utrace-trachook.patch on the arch's ported
before was that it contained historical code that was not fully replaced
until the utrace-ptrace-compat.patch code, so it's a bit clearer when
reading one patch at a time.)

Here is what I'll merge into utrace-tracehook.patch now:

--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -239,7 +239,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ptrace(long request,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out_put_task_struct;
 
-	ret = arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data);
+	/*ret = arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data);*/
+	ret = -ENOSYS;
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out_put_task_struct;
 

Here is what I'd merge into utrace-tracehook-um.patch given Jeff's sign-off:

diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c
index f66d01c..0000000 100644  
--- a/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -16,11 +16,6 @@ void ptrace_disable(struct task_struct *
 { 
 }
 
-long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, long addr, long data)
-{
-	return -ENOSYS;
-}
-
 static void send_sigtrap(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pt_regs *regs,
 			 int error_code)
 {
diff --git a/include/asm-um/tracehook.h b/include/asm-um/tracehook.h
index 5fc0d1a..0000000 100644  
--- a/include/asm-um/tracehook.h
+++ b/include/asm-um/tracehook.h
@@ -53,12 +53,5 @@ static inline void tracehook_abort_sysca
 	PT_REGS_SYSCALL_NR(regs) = -1;
 }
 
-extern const struct utrace_regset_view utrace_um_native;
-static inline const struct utrace_regset_view *
-utrace_native_view(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	return &utrace_um_native;
-}
-
 
 #endif



Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ