linux-kernel - Re: Ten percent test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 07 Apr 2007 16:31:44 -0400
From:	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: Ten percent test

On Saturday 07 April 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 20:08 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com> wrote:
>> > (who the hell runs a 'make -j 200' or 50 while(1)'s in the real
>> > world?
>>
>> not many - and i dont think Mike tested any of these - Mike tested
>> pretty low make -j values (Mike, can you confirm?).
>
>Yes.  I don't test anything more than make -j5 when looking at
>interactivity, and make -j nr_cpus+1 is my must have yardstick.
>
>	-Mike

Somebody made that remark, maybe not you, and maybe they were being funny, 
but I didn't at the time, see any smileys.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Please remain calm, it's no use both of us being hysterical at the same 
time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/