| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:44:34 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com> To: menage@...gle.com Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sekharan@...ibm.com, dev@...ru, xemul@...ru, serue@...ibm.com, vatsa@...ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org, mbligh@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com, devel@...nvz.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] Containers (V8): BeanCounters over generic process containers On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 04:32:27PM -0700, menage@...gle.com wrote: > This patch implements the BeanCounter resource control abstraction > over generic process containers. It contains the beancounter core > code, plus the numfiles resource counter. It doesn't currently contain > any of the memory tracking code or the code for switching beancounter > context in interrupts. > Currently all the beancounters resource counters are lumped into a > single hierarchy; ideally it would be possible for each resource > counter to be a separate container subsystem, allowing them to be I'm very happy to see the BeanCounter work revived. The utility of this work should extend far beyond feature work like containers and into stability and reliability areas as well. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists