lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 08:06:08 +0200 From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ck list <ck@....kolivas.org> Subject: Re: Ten percent test On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 01:16 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 09 April 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote: > >So tar -cvf - / | gzip --best | tar -tvzf - should reproduce the > >problem? > > > > -Mike > > That looks as if it should demo it pretty well if I understand correctly > everything you're doing there. Well, I let it process my ~250GB of data with my current tree, and it looked utterly harmless (and since I'm running SMP, was of course). I'll try building UP to make sure, and check mainline as well. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists