lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:46:17 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org, ak@...e.de,
	muli@...ibm.com, asit.k.mallick@...el.com,
	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, shaohua.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] [Intel IOMMU] Some generic search functions
	required to lookup device relationships.

On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:55:54PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> +/*
> + * find the upstream PCIE-to-PCI bridge of a PCI device
> + * if the device is PCIE, return NULL
> + * if the device isn't connected to a PCIE bridge (that is its parent is a
> + * legacy PCI bridge and the bridge is directly connected to bus 0), return its
> + * parent
> + */
> +struct pci_dev *
> +pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *tmp = NULL;
> +
> +	if (pdev->is_pcie)
> +		return NULL;
> +	while (1) {
> +		if (!pdev->bus->self)
> +			break;
> +		pdev = pdev->bus->self;
> +		/* a p2p bridge */
> +		if (!pdev->is_pcie) {
> +			tmp = pdev;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +		/* PCI device should connect to a PCIE bridge */
> +		BUG_ON(pdev->pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE);
> +		return pdev;
> +	}
> +
> +	return tmp;
> +}

No locking while you walk up the bus list?

> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/include/linux/pci.h	2007-04-03 04:30:51.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/include/linux/pci.h	2007-04-03 06:58:58.000000000 -0700
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@
>  	unsigned short	subsystem_device;
>  	unsigned int	class;		/* 3 bytes: (base,sub,prog-if) */
>  	u8		hdr_type;	/* PCI header type (`multi' flag masked out) */
> +	u8		pcie_type;	/* PCI-E device/port type */
>  	u8		rom_base_reg;	/* which config register controls the ROM */
>  	u8		pin;  		/* which interrupt pin this device uses */
>  
> @@ -168,6 +169,7 @@
>  	unsigned int 	msi_enabled:1;
>  	unsigned int	msix_enabled:1;
>  	unsigned int	is_managed:1;
> +	unsigned int	is_pcie:1;

Do you really need both fields?  Wouldn't just the pcie_type one work
(with some NOT_PCIE type being set for it if it isn't I suppose.)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ