| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:53:37 +0200 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> CC: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/30] Use menuconfig objects Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Apr 11 2007 07:42, Al Boldi wrote: >>Also, I don't think it's necessary to touch any of the "depends on"; keep >>them as is, as they don't hurt staying that way, and may actually be >>necessary under certain circumstances. (see EMBEDDED) > > Simplifying the depends lines is a good thing IMO. If explicit dependency statements are replaced by if--endif blocks, does this count as simplification? -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=-- -=-== http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists