lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 10:04:23 -0400 From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@...il.com> To: "Neil Brown" <neilb@...e.de> Cc: "David R. Litwin" <presently42@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: ZFS with Linux: An Open Plea On 4/13/07, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de> wrote: > On Friday April 13, presently42@...il.com wrote: > > Before I go on, let me appologise. I don't really know what I hope to > > accomplish, beyond trying to garner thoughts (and support?) for the topic. > > > > Essentially: I want to use Linux and ZFS. I don't particularly care about > > licences > > You may not care about licenses, but a lot of people do. And they are > a real issue. > > But I'm more interested in what you really want. > What, specifically, is there in ZFS that you want to use in Linux? > There is lots of interesting stuff in there, but which bit has caught > your attention? It is possible that that functionality can be > incorporated into Linux without trying to clone or copy ZFS. ZFS does have some powerful features but much of it depends on their broken layering of volume management. Embedding the equivalent of LVM into a filesystem _feels_ quite wrong. That aside, the native snapshot capabilities of ZFS really stand out for me. The redirect on write semantics aren't exclusive to ZFS; NetApp's WAFL employs the same. But with both ZFS and WAFL they were designed to do snapshots extremely well from the ground up. Unfortunately in order for Linux to incorporate such a feature I'd imagine a new filesystem would need to be developed with redirect on write at its core. Can't really see ext4 or any other existing Linux filesystem grafting such a feature into it. But even though I can't see it; do others? Begin non-technical patent related babble: As you noted licenses are important, as are patents. Interestingly I've learned that Sun and NetApp's lawyers had it out over the redirect on write capability of ZFS. When the dust settled Sun had enough patent protection to motivate a truce with NetApp. The interesting side-effect is now ZFS is "open" and with that comes redirect on write in a file system other than WAFL. But ZFS's CDDL conflicts with the GPL so I'm not too sure how Linux could hit the ground running in this potentially patent mired area of filesystem development. The validity of NetApp having patented redirect on write aside; does the conflict between CDDL and GPL _really_ matter? Or did the CDDL release of ZFS somehow undermine NetApp's WAFL patent? Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists