lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:20:13 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Zhou Yingchao <yingchao.zhou@...il.com>
Cc:	akpm@....com.au, trond.myklebust@....uio.no, neilb@....unsw.edu.au,
	nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS livelock / starvation ?

On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:24 +0800, Zhou Yingchao wrote:
> When we run a two nfs client and a nfs server in the following way, we
> met a livelock / starvation condition.
> 
> MachineA        MachineB
>  Client1             Client2
>  Server
> 
> As shown in the figure, we run a client and server on one machine, and
> run another client on another machine. When Client1 and Client2 make
> many writes at the same time, the Client1's request is blocked until
> Client2's writes finished.
> 
> We check the code, Client1 is blocked in generic_file_write-> ...
> >balance_dirty_pages, balance_dirty_pages call writeback_inodes to
> (only) flush data of the related fs.
> 
> In nfs, we found that the Server has enhanced its dirty_thresh. So in
> the loop of writeback_inodes, Client1 has no data to write out, and
> the condition "ns_reclaimable+wbs.nr_writeback<=dirty_thresh" will not
> be true until Client2 finishes its write request to Server. So the
> loop will only end after Client2 finished its write job.
> 
> The problem in this path is: why we write only pages of the related fs
> in writeback_inodes but check the dirty thresh for total pages?

I am working on patches to fix this.

Current version at (against -mm):
  http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/balance_dirty_pages/

However, after a rewrite of the BDI statistics work there are some
funnies, which I haven't had time to analyse yet :-/

I hope to post a new version soonish...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists