linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/12] libata: allocate ap separately from shost

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:04:06 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
CC:	IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] libata: allocate ap separately from shost

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Don't embed ap inside shost.  Allocate it separately and point it back
> from shosts's hostdata.  This makes port allocation more flexible and
> allows regular ATA and SAS share host alloc/init paths.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c |   19 ++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/libata.h    |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

applied patches 1-12 to #upstream.

Yay, libata init model is finally clean!

Thanks,

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/