| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:18:42 +0200 From: "Francis Moreau" <francis.moro@...il.com> To: "Evgeniy Polyakov" <johnpol@....mipt.ru> Cc: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, helge.hafting@...el.hist.no, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ? On 4/17/07, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> wrote: > > If there are another users, then flag should not be set. depends if there's a 'generic' algo that can be used at the same time. Admin should know that. > If there are no another users, your code already has exclusive access. sorry I don't understand that. > One can not know if there will be any additional users at all (consider > the case when new encrypted block device or ipsec negotiation started > some time after module was loaded). > well I should say administrator should know. -- Francis - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists