linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Show slab memory usage on OOM and SysRq-M (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:03:05 +0400
From:	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...ru>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, devel@...nvz.org,
	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Show slab memory usage on OOM and SysRq-M (v2)

Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...ru> wrote:
>> The out_of_memory() function and SysRq-M handler call
>> show_mem() to show the current memory usage state.
> 
> I am still somewhat unhappy about the spinlock, but I don't really

What's wrong with the spinlock? It exists there without my
patch, I just make ++/-- of unatomic variable under this lock :)

> have a better suggestion either. Other than that, looks good to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/