linux-kernel - Re: AppArmor FAQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:19:05 -0400 (EDT)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@...a.inka.de>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AppArmor FAQ

On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:

> In article <Line.LNX.4.64.0704180935100.25495@...amei> you wrote:
> > Perhaps -- until your httpd is compromised via a buffer overflow or 
> > simply misbehaves due to a software or configuration flaw, then the 
> > assumptions being made about its use of pathnames and their security 
> > properties are out the window.
> 
> Hu? Even a compromised httpd (especially a compromised httpd) is bound to
> the app armor policies. This means it cannot (for example) write to
> /var/www/* - if it never needed to at normal/profiling time.

This has been addressed several times already, please read the full 
thread.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/