linux-kernel - Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:38:05 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, oleg@...sign.ru, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:41:46 +0100
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:

> There are only two non-net patches that AF_RXRPC depends on:
> 
>  (1) The key facility changes.  That's all my code anyway, and shouldn't be a
>      problem to merge unless someone else has put some changes in there that I
>      don't know about.
> 
>  (2) try_to_cancel_delayed_work().  I suppose I could use
>      cancel_delayed_work() instead, but that's less efficient as it waits for
>      the timer completion function to finish.

There are significant workqueue changes in -mm and I plan to send them
in for 2.6.22.  I doubt if there's anything in there which directly
affects cancel_delayed_work(), but making changes of this nature against
2.6.21 might lead to grief.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/