linux-kernel - Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Neil Brown wrote:

> On Thursday April 19, clameter@....com wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> > 
> > > Not sure how best to fix this one.... kmem_cache_destroy currently
> > > doesn't know which alias is being destroyed.
> > 
> > The aliases are there for decorative purposes when running without
> > debugging. If one switches on debugging then it matters but then the
> > symlinks are not created since there will be no aliases.
> > 
> > I guess we can ignore the problem?
> 
> Maybe....
> But then if we create the same cache with a different size, we might
> need to create a directory in sysfs, but there is already a symlink
> there... 
> It doesn't feel very clean.

Right. Sigh. But there is no user of the symlinks.

I could drop the symlinks completely. Just do not track what names a cache 
aliases to?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/