lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:41:20 +0530
From:	Bhuvan Kumar MITTAL <bhuvan.mittal@...com>
To:	"'Alan Cox'" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: How to make mmap'ed kernel buffer non-cacheable

Hi Alan,

I believe that dma_alloc_coherent will mark the kernel buffer as uncached at alocation time. 
But that is not my intention. I have mapped some user space memory to the kernel buffer and I wish to ensure that the contents of both are coherent and correctly ordered. 

In other words I wish to flush the contents of the kernel buffer to user space as soon as new data is available in my kernel buffer. How to do that? Will doing mysnc from the user space help?

Rather than flushing everytime (or msyncing) I intend to make my user-to-kernel mapping as non cacheable so that multiple flushing can be avoided.

Bhuvan 

> Hi,
>   I am working on an audio device driver development on Linux. I have a kernel buffer which I have mapped to user space using mmap call from user space. My problem is that the data which comes to the kernel buffer is getting dropped in user space and I get only 50-60% of the data which is randomly ordered. The user to kernel level buffer address translation code is fine and I suspect this data dropping is occurring coz the kernel buffer is cacheable. Please suggest me some way of making the entire buffer non cacheable. I am stuck on this for quite a while now. 

The dma mapping API (or the PCI equivalent) provide the neccessary
behaviours for DMA receive, DMA send and consistent memory space in a
portable fashion.

That may not be done using uncachable memory in all cases as not all
processors even support uncacheable memory spaces.

If you are using the ALSA core routines (snd_dma_alloc_coherent) then
ALSA already uses dma_alloc_coherent to ensure the memory is allocated
for the appropriate use and will be kernel marked uncached.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ