linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Return EPERM not ECHILD on security_task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Return EPERM not ECHILD on security_task_wait failure

> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Roland McGrath wrote:
> 
> > This patch makes do_wait return -EPERM instead of -ECHILD if some
> > children were ruled out solely because security_task_wait failed.
> 
> What about using the return value from the security_task_wait hook (which 
> should be -EACCES) ?

As I said in some earlier discussion following my original patch, that
would be fine with me.  I haven't coded up that variant, but it's simple
enough.  Would you like to do it?


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/