linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] UidBind LSM 0.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:01:35 +0200
From:	Roberto De Ioris <roberto@...it.it>
To:	casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] UidBind LSM 0.1

Il giorno mar, 24/04/2007 alle 06.51 -0700, Casey Schaufler ha scritto:
> --- Roberto De Ioris <roberto@...it.it> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > this is a very simple module that allows bind() to tcp/udp port (>=1024)
> > only for the uids defined in a configfs tree.
> 
> Would you be so kind as to cross post to linux-security-module?
> Methinks that you might get additional valuable feedback there.


Surely, in the next hour i will release a new version with tcp/udp
support and the possibility to specify ipv4 addresses.
I will post in linux-security-module too

> 
> > It is a first version, it only works for PF_INET sockets and makes no
> > difference between tcp and udp (i am working on this)
> > 
> > For (little) more info see 
> > 
> > http://projects.unbit.it/uidbind/
> > 
> > Patch attached is for vanilla 2.6.20.7
> 
> It would be correct to return -EACCES rather than -EPERM in the
> access denial case. EACCES indicates that an access control decision
> failed, while EPERM indicates that use of a privileged operation
> was attempted while not possessing appropriate privilege.

Done, thanks :)


-- 
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it
JID: roberto@...ber.unbit.it
Wii: 2999 4476 3509 0964

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)