| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:24:39 -0700 From: Rohit Seth <rohitseth@...gle.com> To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> Cc: Mike Stroyan <mike.stroyan@...com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] ia64: race flushing icache in do_no_page path On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 21:55 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > That's the theory. However, I'd still like to know how the arch code can > make the assertion that icache is known to be at all times other than at > the time of a fault? > Kernel needs to only worry about the updates that it does. So, if kernel is writing into a page that is getting marked with execute permission then it will need to make sure that caches are coherent. ia64 Kernel keeps track of whether it has done any write operation on a page or not using PG_arch_1. And accordingly flushes icaches. > Ie. what if an operation which causes incoherency is carried out _after_ > an executable mapping is installed for that page. > You mean by user space? If so, then it is user space responsibility to do the appropriate operations (like flush icache in this case). -rohit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists