linux-kernel - Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:38:13 +0300
From:	"S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
	Zach Carter <linux@...hcarter.com>,
	Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>,
	buddabrod <buddabrod@...il.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7

Hi Ingo;

29 Nis 2007 Paz tarihinde, Ingo Molnar şunları yazmıştı: 
> * S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@...dus.org.tr> wrote:
> > I'll report if i can find any reproducable problem, so far CFSv7 works
> > as expected :)

After complete 2 day usage, i still can't reproduce previous problems. And 
even can manage to burn a dvd with k3b with one console compiles kernel, 
other checkouts svn repos, amarok plays music, virtualbox boots another 
distro and with 3 tab opened firefox setup :). And i must say system was 
still usable at that time the only thing happened was a little firefox 
slowdown but its really negligable cause with mainline firefox/whole system 
really unusable if i fire a guest in virtualbox.

And lastly boot time still around ~20 sec. which is expected

Apr 29 01:39:04 (up 10.48) /sbin/mudur.py sysinit
Apr 29 01:39:13 (up 18.83) /sbin/mudur.py boot
Apr 29 01:39:18 (up 23.29) /sbin/mudur.py default
...
Apr 29 15:02:54 (up 10.72) /sbin/mudur.py sysinit
Apr 29 15:03:02 (up 17.26) /sbin/mudur.py boot
Apr 29 15:03:06 (up 21.34) /sbin/mudur.py default
...
Apr 30 14:21:56 (up 22.80) /sbin/mudur.py default
Apr 30 14:28:34 (up 15.67) /sbin/mudur.py sysinit
Apr 30 14:28:40 (up 21.02) /sbin/mudur.py boot
...
Apr 30 14:33:26 (up 10.59) /sbin/mudur.py sysinit
Apr 30 14:33:32 (up 15.97) /sbin/mudur.py boot
Apr 30 14:33:35 (up 18.69) /sbin/mudur.py default
...
Apr 30 17:02:09 (up 10.70) /sbin/mudur.py sysinit
Apr 30 17:02:16 (up 17.15) /sbin/mudur.py boot
Apr 30 17:02:19 (up 20.16) /sbin/mudur.py default

So for me, there is no problem at all :)...

Cheers
-- 
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/

Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)