lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 1 May 2007 09:31:40 -0700
From:	Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc:	Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bunk@...sta.de, akpm@...l.org, gcoady@...il.com, zlynx@....org,
	dgc@....com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, andi@...stfloor.org,
	hch@...radead.org, jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de, zwane@...radead.org,
	neilb@...e.de, jens.axboe@...cle.com, eric@...venscaling.com,
	wli@...omorphy.com
Subject: Re: [3/3] use vmalloc() to arrange guard pages for stacks

Bill Irwin wrote:
>> This patch introduces CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK, which vmalloc()'s task and IRQ
>> stacks in order to establish guard pages. In such a manner any stack
>> overflow that references pages immediately adjacent to the stack is
>> immediately trapped with a fault, which precludes silent memory corruption
>> or difficult-to-decipher failure modes resulting from stack corruption.

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:07:15AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Is there a guard page below and above the stack? (I've seen stack underflow
> before, as well as overflow.)

vmallocspace allocations are always separated by at least a page, so
this establishes guard pages both above and below the stack by virtue
of such.

It's also notable that the option establishes guard pages for IRQ stacks
in like fashion.

It's a shame that the resource scalability implications of vmallocspace
allocations prevent this from being useful in production. One could, in
principle, establish guard pages within ZONE_NORMAL, but for 4KB stacks
it's somewhat awkward to dredge up 3 contigous pages, and 4 defeats the
purpose. Alignment with 8KB stacks wants 2 contiguous order 1 pages that
span an order 2 page boundary. I guess I could rewrite the page allocator
(again), but people seem to feel safest with the buddy allocator affairs.

BTW, did the original patches for this prove to be of any use to you?


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ