linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] sysfs: sysfs rework, take #2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 May 2007 15:04:03 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
CC:	gregkh@...e.de, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, oneukum@...e.de,
	rpurdie@...ys.net, stern@...land.harvard.edu, maneesh@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] sysfs: sysfs rework, take #2

Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:39:35 +0900,
> Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> All the known regrssions are fixed.  I think I've got all the
>> attr->owner but haven't verified with cross compiling yet, just
>> allyesconfig on x86-64 and i386.  I'll try to setup some cross compile
>> environments tomorrow and follow up if I can find more fallouts.
> 
> s390 attr->owner seems to be fine afaics.
> 
> I've run some stress tests (attach/detach) on s390 and haven't run into
> any problems yet.

Great, thanks a lot for testing.  I've long stress tests but the only
oops I've seen (which I'm trying to reproduce without success) is caused
by deallocated platform device when udev for it is generated.  So, I
think the sysfs changes are pretty stable.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/