linux-kernel - Re: [patch 01/10] compiler: define __attribute_unused_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 May 2007 17:05:46 +0200
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 01/10] compiler: define __attribute_unused__

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:55:50PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> "many ... are marked __attribute__ ((unused))" is not true:
> $ grep -r __attribute_used__ * | wc -l
> 60
> $ 

Sorry, my fault - I confused used and unused.

>...
> Unused static non-inline functions are the only functions resulting in 
> warnings when being unused.
> If we don't want gcc to emit warnings for such, we could disable them 
> globally.

But this point still stands:

If we don't want any warnings with CONFIG_PCI=n, CONFIG_SYSFS=n or
CONFIG_PROC_FS=n, we'd have to annotate _many_ functions.

If the lonterm goal is to compile the kernel with -Werror then we need 
-Wno-unused-function, not annotating individual functions.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/