linux-kernel - Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 May 2007 20:15:33 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
Cc:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
	Ting Yang <tingy@...umass.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8


* William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com> wrote:

> > There is also p->wait_runtime which is taken into account when 
> > calculating p->fair_key. So if p3 had waiting in runqueue for long 
> > before, it can get to run quicker than 10ms later.
> 
> Virtual time is time from the task's point of view, which it has spent 
> executing. ->wait_runtime is a device to subtract out time spent on 
> the runqueue but not running from what would otherwise be virtual time 
> to express lag, whether deliberately or coincidentally. [...]

CFS is in fact _built around_ the ->wait_runtime metric (which, as its 
name suggests already, expresses the precise lag a task observes 
relative to 'ideal' fair execution), so what exactly makes you suspect 
that this property of the ->wait_runtime metric might be 'coincidental'? 
;-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/