linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] I/OAT updates for 2.6.22

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 May 2007 16:27:44 -0700
From:	Chris Leech <christopher.leech@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] I/OAT updates for 2.6.22

On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 15:44 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> 
> Chrstopher, I really really would like you to post these patches early
> and often to netdev@...r.kernel.org especially because you are
> touching the TCP code.

You're right, I should have sent this to netdev as well.  I'm Sorry.

As for early and often, I have posted all of these patches to netdev,
and made suggested changes, and re-posted.

And when I have other networking changes, you can bet they'll get sent
to netdev for review first before I think about asking that they be
included.

> You aren't doing this, for several rounds, and just submitting your
> stuff directly to Linus, Andrew, and lkml, and it's starting to annoy
> me greatly.

For several rounds, I've been posting patches that go nowhere.  I
honestly don't care if they go straight to Linus, through you, or
through Andrew.

- Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/