lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	04 May 2007 14:32:59 +0200
From:	Urs Thuermann <urs@...ogud.escape.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Q: copy_*_user() with size==0

Reading the i386 source of copy_to_user() and reading some instances
of how it's used, it seems valid to pass 0 for the size argument and
that kernel address pointers, i.e. the @from argument in
copy_to_user() and the @to argument in copy_from_user() don't matter
in this case.  Is this correct for all arch's?  I don't see this
behavior documented anywhere.

urs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ