linux-kernel - Re: [RFT][PATCH] swsusp: Change code ordering related to ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 May 2007 16:11:17 -0700
From:	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Marcus Better" <marcus@...ter.se>, "Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>,
	"Tobias Diedrich" <ranma+kernel@...edrich.de>,
	"pm list" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH] swsusp: Change code ordering related to ACPI

On 5/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> The change of the hibernation/suspend code ordering made before 2.6.21 has
> caused some systems to have problems related to ACPI.  In particular, the
> 'platform' hibernation mode doesn't work any more on some systems.

It seems that somewhere between 2.6.21-rc4 and 2.6.21 final my laptop
stopped being able to come out of suspend to RAM. Before I start
bisecting (again, sigh), is this ringing any bells for anyone? In
particular your, patch (snipped) that deals with hibernation, would it
also affect suspend to RAM?

Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/