[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 08:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, dgc@....com,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] SLUB: Implement targeted reclaim and partial list
defragmentation
On Sat, 5 May 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> clameter@....com writes:
> >
> > NOTE: This patch is for conceptual review. I'd appreciate any feedback
> > especially on the locking approach taken here. It will be critical to
> > resolve the locking issue for this approach to become feasable.
>
> Do you have any numbers on how this improves dcache reclaim under memory pressure?
How does one measure something like that?
I wanted to first make sure that the thing is sane. If there is a gaping
race here then I may have to add more code to cover that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists