lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 16:41:23 -0700 From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com> To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> Cc: "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>, "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>, "Wang, Peter Xihong" <peter.xihong.wang@...el.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org Subject: RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 18:45 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Hmmmm.. One potential issues are the complicated way the slab is > handled. Could you try this patch and see what impact it has? > The patch boost the throughput of TCP_STREAM test by 5%, for both slab and slub. But slab is still 5% better in my tests. > If it has any then remove the cachline alignment and see how that > influences things. Removing the cacheline alignment didn't change the throughput. Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists