linux-kernel - Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:	Sat, 5 May 2007 15:39:40 +0200
From:	"pHilipp Zabel" <philipp.zabel@...il.com>
To:	cbou@...l.ru
Cc:	"Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <hmh@....eng.br>,
	"Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Shem Multinymous" <multinymous@...il.com>,
	kernel-discuss@...dhelds.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)

On 5/5/07, Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru> wrote:
> Hello Henrique, Shem,
>
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:54:13AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Fri, 04 May 2007, Shem Multinymous wrote:
> > > >+enum power_supply_type {
> > > >+       POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_BATTERY = 0,
> > > >+       POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_UPS,
> > > >+       POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_AC,
> > > >+       POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_USB,
> > > >+};
> > >
> > > How about dumb (non-USB) DC power? Any reason to distinguish it from AC?
> >
> > Hmm, if it should not be distinguished, it is better to rename AC to
> > something that means continuous power.  But I'd rather have it AC and DC, as
> > something might have both supplies separate, and you might want to
> > differentiate them for some (human interface) reason.  After all, USB and DC
> > are not really different anyway...
> >
> > Anyway, what IS the difference between UPS and battery, or UPS and AC/DC for
> > that matter?  When should UPS be used?  If you have UPS there, should not
> > MGG (motor-generator group) also be provided?
> >
> > Given that USB-power *is* usually also "dumb" (i.e. it doesn't do any
> > control signaling over the USB bus for power-control purposes), IMHO it
> > might be better to have just battery, AC and DC as types.  And a primary and
> > secondary notion too, as that is common.  It would be generic.
> >
> > Or maybe I just didn't get the idea behind the "type" attribute :-)
> >
> > I'd appreciate if these were documented in the text file.
>
> I think I got the start point of confusion. It's indeed bad to call such
> power supply type as AC. Maybe I should it rename to ADAPTER? Or WALL?

or MAINS?

> type, is really `type' of power supply: imagine icon GUI application will
> use for different types. Type is not alternating/direct current stuff,
> it will be better to impelemnt `current_type' attribute for such matter.
>
> As for Battery/UPS difference.. yes, they're quite similar.. but again,
> imagine laptop with battery, and connected to UPS. ;-) How userspace
> will differ internal battery from UPS? Yup, by type attribute. I hope
> it makes sense... If not, we simply can remove UPS type.
>
>
> And again, much thanks for your review and ideas!
>
> --
> Anton Vorontsov
> email: cbou@...l.ru
> backup email: ya-cbou@...dex.ru
> irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel-discuss mailing list
> Kernel-discuss@...dhelds.org
> https://handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-discuss
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives