| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:16:25 -0400 From: "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@...il.com> To: johnstul@...ibm.com, tjanouse@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tsmetana@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com Subject: Re: Broken process startup times after suspend (regression) john stultz writes: > Indeed. The monotonic clock's behavior around suspend and resume > is poorly defined. When we increased it, folks didn't like the > fact that uptime would increase while a system was suspended. The uptime really does need to increase during suspend. Otherwise, things get really weird with devices like the OLPC XO which will be sleeping between keystrokes. You could run the device for hours, yet get an uptime of only a few minutes. Suspended time should get counted as stolen time, same as when a hypervisor takes away time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists