linux-kernel - Re: Request to mailing list Linux-arm-kernel rejected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 May 2007 10:22:24 +0100
From:	Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Request to mailing list Linux-arm-kernel rejected

On 12/05/07 08:52, linux-arm-kernel-bounces@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
> Your request to the Linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> 
>     Posting of your message titled "[PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/arm/"
> 
> has been rejected by the list moderator.  The moderator gave the
> following reason for rejecting your request:
> 
> "Non-members are not allowed to post messages to this list. You need
> to subscribe before you're allowed to post. Use the patch system for
> patches (see www.arm.linux.org.uk) "

It's amazing, you appear to have taken the worst feature of bug/feature 
management systems - mandatory registration - and applied it to patch 
submission too.

Is that rejection message standard? The first part makes no sense - why 
would you hold non-subscriber emails in a submission queue and then just 
reject them because they're not subscribers?

> Any questions or comments should be directed to the list administrator
> at:
> 
>     linux-arm-kernel-owner@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk

-- 
Simon Arlott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/