linux-kernel - Re: slab hang on boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 May 2007 16:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	mroos@...ux.ee, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: slab hang on boot

On Tue, 15 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Mon, 14 May 2007 16:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
> Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -86,6 +87,9 @@ static inline int kmalloc_index(int size
> >  	 */
> >  	WARN_ON_ONCE(size == 0);
> >  
> > +	if (size >= (1UL << KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH))
> > +		return -1;
> > +
> 
> I don't quite understand why we did this.  The subsequent logic in
> kmalloc_index() should return -1 for this `size' anyway.  If it doesn't,
> it's bust, isn't it?

KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH is not a constant but may be less than 25.

> Also, afaict kmalloc_slab() will totally mishandle the -1 return value and
> will return a garbage kmem_cache*, via
> 
>         return &kmalloc_caches[index];

It does an

if (index < 0)

before getting to that statement.
 
> Could you double-check it all please?

It was already checked.


 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/